Politicians and most others have no knowledge of embryology. In fact, no embryologist was consulted during the determination of the Roe v. Wade decision.
Most extremely inaccurate is the suggestion that a "fertilized egg" implants. Almost immediately upon fertilization, which occurs in the upper portion of the fallopian tubes, the evanescent zygote divides, and therefore no longer exists as such. The new human organism quickly differentiates and becomes a blastocyst or early embryo consisting of multiple tissue types by the time it implants into the wall of the uterus. This docking procedure is directed by complex chemical communication between the embryo and mother.
Conflating the unfortunate situation of treating ectopic pregnancy with elective abortion has been one effective way to scare people into rubberstamping the latter recreational killing practice. Perhaps the popularization of methotrexate for treating non-emergent ectopic pregnancy has cemented this idea.
Abortion itself is traumatic to the mother and is not done to save the mother's life. Early delivery is sometimes necessary to save the mother's life, and efforts to keep the baby alive are done. This is much different than dismembering and sucking out the parts of the baby as is done in surgical abortions. (There is not currently a way to successfully save an ectopic human embryo, though this will become possible for the civilization that replaces us.)
Sentencing an innocent bystander to death for the crime of rape is profoundly illogical and immoral. Studies indicate that such practices significantly increase the suicidality of the affected women. Therefore it is more likely that this malpractice is much more for population control than for the sake of traumatized women.
Expressing personal preferences as to the timing of killing humans in the name of pragmatism is likewise illogical. There is no logically consistent, developmental dividing line which has been put forth as a time when the human organism may be willfully killed, and when it may not.
That republicans have been unable to articulate these and related facts for 50 years is more evidence of their weakness and unsuitability as a political party.
Either premeditated, capricious / recreational killing of humans will be recognized as wrong and illegal, or this civilization will fall, and be replaced as many have throughout history. It's only a matter of time.
It sounds to me like you are prepared to make the argument for a total abortion ban in great scientific detail. I would invite you to run for office on this platform and report back to us how many votes you get. In the meantime, conservatives will have lost the opportunity to reverse the 30-million strong invasion of America by illegal aliens.
One long-term benefit, however, is that if America is overtaken by jihadism, as is currently happening in Europe, we may be able finally to enact a total abortion ban. America will be unrecognizable at that point, but perhaps it is a small price to pay.
You are welcome to run for office, and inform the voters that if a mother's life is endangered by her pregnancy, ending that pregnancy will make her a murderer; and the best remedy for her situation is to accept death gracefully. I can predict the outcome of that election.
My current priority is preventing the actual destruction of America. That overrules any other consideration.
I wonder if you are aware of the distinction between murder and homicide; of the concept of mens rea; and if you believe in the right to self-defense, national or individual.
Certainly it is time to allow the replacement of current corrupt and ineffectual parties which have lost the confidence of everyone who isn't taking a paycheck from them.
The demise and replacement of most civilizations in the past has been related to their willingness to kill their own children.
Since that is the case for our culture, and turning the majority from this seems unlikely, it absolutely will be replaced. People should prepare themselves to survive through the replacement process, which will be very uncomfortable.
And what say you on same sex marriage? Yay or nay. An expectant mother’s life, being in danger from her pregnancy, is near zero %, except tubal pregnancies. Homicide is the general cause of death, that might be determined by many factors or degrees. Mens re-a wouldn’t apply to the provider, ever. Occasionally to the expectant mom. In truth, self defense is provided for by the Creator, individual and national. I have read you for years and will continue. I admire your dedication to saving America!
Politicians and most others have no knowledge of embryology. In fact, no embryologist was consulted during the determination of the Roe v. Wade decision.
Most extremely inaccurate is the suggestion that a "fertilized egg" implants. Almost immediately upon fertilization, which occurs in the upper portion of the fallopian tubes, the evanescent zygote divides, and therefore no longer exists as such. The new human organism quickly differentiates and becomes a blastocyst or early embryo consisting of multiple tissue types by the time it implants into the wall of the uterus. This docking procedure is directed by complex chemical communication between the embryo and mother.
Conflating the unfortunate situation of treating ectopic pregnancy with elective abortion has been one effective way to scare people into rubberstamping the latter recreational killing practice. Perhaps the popularization of methotrexate for treating non-emergent ectopic pregnancy has cemented this idea.
Abortion itself is traumatic to the mother and is not done to save the mother's life. Early delivery is sometimes necessary to save the mother's life, and efforts to keep the baby alive are done. This is much different than dismembering and sucking out the parts of the baby as is done in surgical abortions. (There is not currently a way to successfully save an ectopic human embryo, though this will become possible for the civilization that replaces us.)
Sentencing an innocent bystander to death for the crime of rape is profoundly illogical and immoral. Studies indicate that such practices significantly increase the suicidality of the affected women. Therefore it is more likely that this malpractice is much more for population control than for the sake of traumatized women.
Expressing personal preferences as to the timing of killing humans in the name of pragmatism is likewise illogical. There is no logically consistent, developmental dividing line which has been put forth as a time when the human organism may be willfully killed, and when it may not.
That republicans have been unable to articulate these and related facts for 50 years is more evidence of their weakness and unsuitability as a political party.
Either premeditated, capricious / recreational killing of humans will be recognized as wrong and illegal, or this civilization will fall, and be replaced as many have throughout history. It's only a matter of time.
It sounds to me like you are prepared to make the argument for a total abortion ban in great scientific detail. I would invite you to run for office on this platform and report back to us how many votes you get. In the meantime, conservatives will have lost the opportunity to reverse the 30-million strong invasion of America by illegal aliens.
One long-term benefit, however, is that if America is overtaken by jihadism, as is currently happening in Europe, we may be able finally to enact a total abortion ban. America will be unrecognizable at that point, but perhaps it is a small price to pay.
Exodus 20:13 Some 1st degree murder is essential in seeking domination politically? (Amplified version)
You are welcome to run for office, and inform the voters that if a mother's life is endangered by her pregnancy, ending that pregnancy will make her a murderer; and the best remedy for her situation is to accept death gracefully. I can predict the outcome of that election.
My current priority is preventing the actual destruction of America. That overrules any other consideration.
I wonder if you are aware of the distinction between murder and homicide; of the concept of mens rea; and if you believe in the right to self-defense, national or individual.
Certainly it is time to allow the replacement of current corrupt and ineffectual parties which have lost the confidence of everyone who isn't taking a paycheck from them.
The demise and replacement of most civilizations in the past has been related to their willingness to kill their own children.
Since that is the case for our culture, and turning the majority from this seems unlikely, it absolutely will be replaced. People should prepare themselves to survive through the replacement process, which will be very uncomfortable.
And what say you on same sex marriage? Yay or nay. An expectant mother’s life, being in danger from her pregnancy, is near zero %, except tubal pregnancies. Homicide is the general cause of death, that might be determined by many factors or degrees. Mens re-a wouldn’t apply to the provider, ever. Occasionally to the expectant mom. In truth, self defense is provided for by the Creator, individual and national. I have read you for years and will continue. I admire your dedication to saving America!