I have mixed feelings about that documentary. It has some very important content that everyone needs to watch.
On the other hand, how will most people react when the movie begins with pictures of the Kennedy assassination, the 9/11 attacks, and... Bigfoot? They will roll their eyes and walk away. I thought that was a very foolish "own goal". Stew could have red-pilled more people if he had simply focused on CoVID and the jabs.
Hello! I saw your comment (and appreciated it). Regarding the SSRI topic, a subset of the people who receive them do benefit from them greatly (William Walsh has gone into this and I tried to cover it in the article--the important part is that those who will benefit are never screened for).
The problem is that many do not and are seriously harmed from them (prior to the COVID vaccines, the SSRIs had one of the worse total severe injury rates for any pharmaceutical on the market). I have friends who have benefitted from them when nothing else worked, and a comparable number who were severely harmed. A risk/benefit profile like that is not acceptable for a medication, especially one that is given out indiscriminately and often quite aggressively pushed on patients.
My position is that medication should be one component in a multi-dimensional approach to wellness. You have to look at the patient's diet, exercise, nutritional supplements (thank you for mentioning Dr. Walsh), social life, involvement with technology, involvement with spirituality, plus cognitive-behavioral therapy. (I have also benefited enormously from neurofeedback.) The patient needs to have it made clear that a pill will not solve their problems. They must be an active participant in their own growth on every level.
You allude as well to a problem with practitioners, who may know little other than their limited curriculum in med school combined with the slick presentations (and gifts) of pharma representatives. There needs to be a greater degree of curiosity, open-mindedness, and cooperation in the broad field of wellness, that liberates us from the primitive remedies of cut-burn-poison, and the tendency to treat symptoms rather than underlying causes, causes which may include identifying and removing a whole range of toxins. I think there is room for the germ theory of disease and the terrain theory of disease to compromise.
Some benefits we may see in the aftermath of the coming democide include the destruction of the current paradigm of sickcare, replacing it with the maintenance of wellness; less reliance on authority and more demand for evidence; respect for the autonomy of others; the assumption of responsibility for ourselves; the eagerness to learn more.
Surak, the second graph is the one that needs to be shown to the world.
Good to see you are keeping up the good work.
Have you watched this:
https://rumble.com/v1wac7i-world-premier-died-suddenly.html
It is very very disturbing how our medical professionals have deliberately deceived us.
Hi, Mo! Always great to hear from you.
I have mixed feelings about that documentary. It has some very important content that everyone needs to watch.
On the other hand, how will most people react when the movie begins with pictures of the Kennedy assassination, the 9/11 attacks, and... Bigfoot? They will roll their eyes and walk away. I thought that was a very foolish "own goal". Stew could have red-pilled more people if he had simply focused on CoVID and the jabs.
I, too, reacted badly to the whole conspiracy stuff. Opening up on depopulation was a really bad idea.
Stick to the coroners, the death spiral videos, etc.
I agree with you, it’s one of the most stated comments sadly and hides the terrible truth.
Hello! I saw your comment (and appreciated it). Regarding the SSRI topic, a subset of the people who receive them do benefit from them greatly (William Walsh has gone into this and I tried to cover it in the article--the important part is that those who will benefit are never screened for).
The problem is that many do not and are seriously harmed from them (prior to the COVID vaccines, the SSRIs had one of the worse total severe injury rates for any pharmaceutical on the market). I have friends who have benefitted from them when nothing else worked, and a comparable number who were severely harmed. A risk/benefit profile like that is not acceptable for a medication, especially one that is given out indiscriminately and often quite aggressively pushed on patients.
My position is that medication should be one component in a multi-dimensional approach to wellness. You have to look at the patient's diet, exercise, nutritional supplements (thank you for mentioning Dr. Walsh), social life, involvement with technology, involvement with spirituality, plus cognitive-behavioral therapy. (I have also benefited enormously from neurofeedback.) The patient needs to have it made clear that a pill will not solve their problems. They must be an active participant in their own growth on every level.
You allude as well to a problem with practitioners, who may know little other than their limited curriculum in med school combined with the slick presentations (and gifts) of pharma representatives. There needs to be a greater degree of curiosity, open-mindedness, and cooperation in the broad field of wellness, that liberates us from the primitive remedies of cut-burn-poison, and the tendency to treat symptoms rather than underlying causes, causes which may include identifying and removing a whole range of toxins. I think there is room for the germ theory of disease and the terrain theory of disease to compromise.
Some benefits we may see in the aftermath of the coming democide include the destruction of the current paradigm of sickcare, replacing it with the maintenance of wellness; less reliance on authority and more demand for evidence; respect for the autonomy of others; the assumption of responsibility for ourselves; the eagerness to learn more.
I completely agree!