Why do voters choose this?
It's madness
My X feed has become dominated by one type of post, probably because I engage with it more than most. These posts come from Europe, Australia, Canada, and America. They contain a video featuring violent criminal activity. The perpetrators are illegal aliens, or sometimes legal immigrants or even citizens belonging to a subculture that is hostile to the dominant culture. The victims are natives of these countries.
In each case, the perpetrators come from countries with a very low quality of life. They are fortunate to have been admitted to live in a country with a very high quality of life. Rather than displaying their gratitude, the perpetrators seek to replicate the same failed society among their new hosts. This begins with maiming or killing their new hosts.
As I noted in that earlier article, the most desirable countries are the ones listed in the first paragraph, and the least desirable countries are either majority Muslim, or in Africa, or are communist. In the case of Islam and communism, there is a religious command to conquer the rest of the world. Africa has the highest fertility.
The video posts usually feature extremely violent assaults. Each time I see these video posts on X, I repost them together with a caption: “Why do American-Australian-British-Canadian-Dutch-French-German-Italian-Portuguese-Spanish-Swedish [as the case may be] voters choose this?” In other words, experiencing such violence is completely up to the choices of society. Why do people want to live like this?
The good conspiracy theorist will answer darkly that the elections are rigged; that in fact most voters favor secure borders and repatriation, but the powers that be (choose your favorite scapegoat) have decided to control the population against their will.
This is nonsense. Look at this video posted yesterday:
I think this took place in Florida. The crazy people interviewed asserted “Allahu akbar” in admitted solidarity with “radical Islamists”, but refused to assert “Make America great again”, presumably because Donald Trump’s skin is orange.
Such people define themselves by their antagonisms. They know they hate successful heterosexual white male conservative Christians, people who are very productive and happy. They are unproductive and unhappy by choice, so they promote anything that is the opposite of what they hate, usually the most dysfunctional people around. Unfortunately, that includes perpetrators of violence, and the more demographic variables that distinguish them from the hated group, the better.
We should not criminalize mental illness any more than we should criminalize political differences, but we have to be honest about its harmful influence in our society. “Allahu akbar” is a call to destroy Western civilization. Tolerance cannot include civilizational suicide.
In the last month, we have seen Spain commit to national suicide. The voters want that. Which other polities have chosen suicide? So far, Australia, Britain, and Canada are well down the road. Muslim assailants are not arrested, but people who defend themselves or criticize jihad or fly the national flag are arrested. Reform, Nigel Farage’s party in the UK, avoids the topic of remigration. Here in America, Republicans are being advised to stop talking about mass deportation.
There is a meme on X that captures the dynamic. It is a cartoon drawing of two men standing facing each other in the park. One man with a long dark beard is wearing the headdress and flowing robes of the Middle East. The other is a white European. The first man is plunging a knife into the second man while saying, “Allahu akbar.” The second man is saying, “At least I am not racist.”
Is this how Western civilization ends? Not with a bang, but with a whimper?
No, the Second Amendment and your rifle or shotgun are not going to save the country, not even your household. Of course, if we had secession, then we could isolate the crazy people in little islands.
We have to get the nominally conservative parties serious about completely defunding academia, one of the epicenters of cultural rot. Secure borders (wall), secure elections (voter ID for citizens only), and E-Verify would go a long way towards a winning platform to save us from invaders. Thus we could secure the external and internal threats.
Good point Surak and I am sure that some people actually do elect them but Britain didn’t really. It was the lowest turnout in history which meant that only 25% of the electorate voted for the lunatics we have now.
We have had a conservative government for 14 years and it got worse. We voted to leave the EU but we’re still a member of the ECHR and other dumb rules.
People didn’t vote to protest and also thousands of people spoiled there votes in protest.
Speak to any normal person in a pub and they all disagree with mass migration.
The people is globalism led by the UN.